When, on the second day, he complains that the destruction of the house is too much like work, he is easily talked into staying and helping. And as to meaning, the story is not absurdist, although it is, perhaps, within hailing distance of the Absurd. The nationalization of the Bank of England and other industries and the passage of the National Health Service Act of and other socialist programs marked a point of no return for England which Greene and other observers noted with mixed feelings. Greene often offers the possibility of redemption somewhere within the work. His intention to destroy Mr. We might well suppose that chance is to be equated with chaos, and we might choose, as do theologians and moral philosophers, to define evil as fundamental disorder. He has been inside Mr.

In the following essay, Bussey considers whether or not Graham Greene leaves open the possibility of redemption in his short story. Trevor conceives of the plan in the abstract and maneuvers politically to bring about its implementation. However though Greene is adding humour it is not lost on the reader just how serious affairs are. A related paradox in the story is when T. Despite its setting in post- World War II England, the story is universal in its reflection of human nature. Rather he willingly accepts that T.

His intention to destroy Mr. No longer is his father an architect and there is a sense that T. The story begins by introducing us to the Wormsley Common Gang, a group of boys ranging from nine to fifteen years of age, who live in a tough area of London and spend their summer holiday pulling pranks. In reality, the war years have claimed their youthful innocence, leaving them disillusioned and determined to create their own world order, but all they really know is destruction.

When the driver finds the situation funny Mr. In the s and s, novelists such as Greene wrote traditional fiction that was well-crafted enough both to stand up to innovative fiction of the day and to gain a wide and loyal audience. Because Greene is a convert to Catholicism, the natural tendency is to assume his orthodoxy and to judge the destruction of the house by orthodox standards: Yet as a modern intellectual very much in touch with contemporary politics, he certainly must be equally aware of the social inequities often fostered by that conservative tradition.


As to why T. The Wormsley Common Gang, while representative of fallen man at large, are also representative of a new generation, and one wonders if, with some deeply intuitive understanding, they are not trying to teach the older generation the lessons of the past—and the recent present.

The Destructors – Wikipedia

It is possible that T. Known as teddy boys, these groups of boys banded together in the name of delinquency and destruction.

These are powerful factors that have the ability to destroy the country from the inside out, just as the boys destroy Mr. It was Wren, who more than any other man, created both order and beauty out of the chaotic shambles that was London after the great fire of Rather than being the leader that the rest of the gang support.

Thomas to show him its remarkable interiors. He is not the Vice of the medieval morality play, nor is he Iago, nor Satan himself. Destductors explains that it is not personal, but he thinks it is funny. These groups of boys are regarded as products of the postwar society in which they lived, having been exposed to violence and instability as children. He says, instead, that the two of them should burn the money as a celebration.

To do so would be giving them a power that they no longer possess. Such an interpretation of the scene makes it difficult to regard Trevor as a satanic monster. Readers may interpret this as a message about the price of war or as a warning of what may come if something is not done to reverse desturctors trends. Thomas arrives home early, T. This scene not only portrays Blackie as the committed worker, but it also portrays Trevor once more as the political theorist, the Trotsky of the group.

It is here that Old Misery sits disconsolately as the Wormsley Common Gang summay its only possible absolute, that of destruction: He is essentially the doer, the worker, and is miscast as theorizer. In the wake of World War II, these are disturbing images of a new generation of power-hungry young people emerging from the wartime experience.


If Greene is indeed saying, as he seems to be, that in this late hour, man must come thoroughly to know himself— most especially his dark potentialities—before he can save himself, he is striking exactly the same thematic note as Golding does in Lord of the Flies. Indeed, the gang punctiliously observes its rules and operates in a decidedly thd fashion.

Mike has always been easily surprised and gullible; when he was nine, he believed someone who told him that if he did not keep his mouth shut, he would get a frog in it.

On the other hand, Jesse F.

Short Story Analysis: The Destructors by Graham Greene – The Sitting Bee

Thomas uses an outdoor lavatory. Retrieved 24 December But to them, as to modern man generally, all absolutes are impossible of achievement save one—destruction. Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Ggaham.

Graham Greene Stories of Ourselves. He accepts, that is, a view of time and history as cyclical process, a process that inevitably involves the demise of Western Christian civilization. Walking through the house, he notices how methodically the boys are destroying everything from the floors to the banisters, while leaving the walls gresne.

LitCharts From the creators of SparkNotes, something better. Bloom, Harold, and William Golding, eds.

The Destructors

What is most perplexing about the story is its tone: The barren landscape symbolizes the erosion of aesthetic values in a postwar world. They are fully aware that what they sujmary doing is wrong yet believe that they will not go to prison for breaking things.

The gang was puzzled and perturbed by this action and tried in explain it away. Greene finally makes quite clear that the initial conflict has been fully resolved through collaboration. Part of innocence is surrender to the imagination.

Related Posts