BOSE ACOUSTIMASS 10 SERIES IV REVIEW CNET
Middle of the road. I’ve been through many upgrades through the years since but the only setup I ever regret owning was the Bose. If you are not worried about it, then there are lots of options available for that price that are far better than the Bose. The Quadral package is no slouch on the looks and build front either. The sizeable satellites need plenty of running in to get rid of their initial hard edge. The construction of your kit will often mirror how well it performs, and poorly-built equipment can vibrate terribly, affecting sound quality, and ultimately your enjoyment.
I’m strongly considering the CA s30’s for my HT setup. Bill Fitzmaurice is offline. Most folks jaws drop when they see what I have in a 15×16 room. Just off the mark. The satellites do a decent enough job – although they sound a touch thin compared to the likes of the JM Lab Sibs – but it’s the bass that lets it down. Throughout all of the packages, this almost uniform sizing makes setting up the satellites relatively simple. The mid-range The Quadral system sits somewhere near the the middle of this test when it comes to music playback. No tweeters mean weak highs!
Considering Bose Acoustimass 10 – AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Looking good The Quadral package is no slouch on the looks and build front either. Tussle for the top.
Crowson Shadow 8 – X2 Video: I ended up buying a system that literally blew away the Bose systems that I had. Also, in the acoustimazs run, the system may prove to be a poor investment if it breaks.
The package’s sonic performance is reasonable as well, and while it’s not up to the standards of the best we heard in this test, it certainly betters that of the Bose. The sub digs deep for the big blasts of DTS power whenever a rocket launches in Gattacaand the sound is believable from the surrounds.
That aside, and taken on its own merit, we can’t really fault this package. The JM Lab package doesn’t quite demonstrate the level of differentiation between the two formats that the KEF system manages. The KEF is just a better all-round bet. I will look into these options, and i will update you my proceedings. They have an impressive solidity to their sound, and plenty of weight and presence, while voices are delivered with precision. The Quadral system performs somewhat revied, however, it still misses out on being in the leading pack.
The Quadral package is no slouch on the looks and build front either. My budget may not cross 1K. Philharmonics- BMR in a 2.
Just off the mark The Quadral system performs somewhat better, however, it still misses out on being in the leading pack. The satellite speakers rfview longer to run in than most of the others here, and when they do finally lose their brittle sound, they prove to be better than the Bose.
Bose Acoustimass 10 Series V – speaker system – for home theater Overview – CNET
The others are all reasonably well suited to their respective systems’ needs. Throughout all of the packages, this almost uniform sizing makes setting up the satellites relatively simple. The Cube satellites may look simple, but that’s a good thing, and once in place acoustiass really do seem to disappear into the background, leaving you free to concentrate fully on the sound.
After all, the satellites here are ic enough to stick the front left and right boxes directly on top of a pair of ‘proper’ hi-fi stereo speakers. Its attractively finished exterior and reasonable size means you can keep it on display, even though, as with all of the subwoofers here, you can also hide it behind a sofa.
The mid-range The Quadral system sits somewhere near the the middle of this test when it comes to music playback. That leaves us with the best two of the bunch. deries
For a dollars, you can get 5. Big suprise, another Bose drive-by post Their built in powered subwoofers will give you some decent bass extension for movies until you can add a dedicated subwoofer. Most folks jaws drop when they see what I have in a 15×16 room. With movies or with music it presents a particularly wide and detailed soundstage, and the extremely capable subwoofer has more then enough guts to perform with the deep thudding bass needed to get the best out of home cinema.
Your room is far to large for satellite speaker system with small speakers. Hi, I just bought the acoustimass 10 i love the bose sound for movies. It’s a great-looking package, solidly built and with a performance level that all bar the KEF can’t hope to attain. On the construction front, we are happy to report that all of the speaker systems in this test are solid and well built, but, three of the products are particularly worthy of mention However, the impressive performance of the KEF system doesn’t adversely affect the value rating of the JM Lab product.
God willing, we will prevail in peace and freedom from fear and in true health through the purity and essence of our natural fluids.
Tussle for the top That leaves us with the best two of the bunch. A 20×25 room is a big room to fill. I also found a set of Wharfedale Diamond I’ve been through many upgrades through the years since but the only setup I ever regret owning was the Bose. Others on this site are very experienced and have tons of good information and opinions about what your options are.
The American company usually attempts to break the mould, and this product is no different. Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links. Three of a kind?
Bose Acoustimass 10 Series IV speaker system
I think before, i didnt calibrated well. Jack D Ripper is offline. How well built your speakers are cbet vital. Thanks for all your suggestions. Even the larger speakers here struggle, with only the JM Lab Sibs creating any worthwhile deep sound, which is explained partly by the fact they can be bought as a stereo pair.